Try our cookies Alza.cz a. s., Company identification number 27082440, uses cookies to ensure the functionality of the website and with your consent also to personalisage the content of our website. By clicking on the “I understand“ button, you agree to the use of cookies and the transfer of data regarding the behavior on the website for displaying targeted advertising on social networks and advertising networks on other websites.
Alzak icon
Catalogue
Intel Arc B580 Limited Edition - Graphics Card

Reviews Intel Arc B580 Limited Edition

Interested in reviews of Intel Arc B580 Limited Edition? It got 4.7 out of 5 stars from our customers. Find specific customer reviews of Intel Arc B580 Limited Edition below. We will appreciate if you also share your experiences with Intel Arc B580 Limited Edition after purchasing.
299.90 €
In stock > 5 pcs
Add to Cart More Information

User Reviews

Tomáš, Líněflag
Rated 30/04/2025, variant Intel Arc B580 Limited Edition
Verified purchase - review from a price comparison website
Bought for 6950czk
Good value for money
The packaging gives the feeling of a super product
A bit noisy in full load
Performance could always be better
You can't just give in
Good flies in the drivers
0 ×Report
Automatic translation
David, Hanušoviceflag
Rated 13/03/2025, variant Intel Arc B580 Limited Edition
Verified purchase
I was changing from RX 580 8G I was still hesitating whether B580, RX 7600 or RTX 4060. I'm pleasantly surprised from Intel and not just with the processing. The increase in performance is of course noticeable, image quality, silence, temperatures as well (AMD was making noise like a shuttle taking off, temperature 75°C and I expected the whole box to fly to the neighboring village, I haven't even heard ARC yet and temperatures up to 60°C) During normal use (internet, video, browser games) it doesn't even heat up to 45°C, so the fans don't spin, after increasing power the temperature goes up to the above mentioned 60°C. They are austere, but again clear, here - there they crash, but only the interface, otherwise everything runs normally (previous AMD also no glory), but I believe that Intel after gathered information will fix it Who hesitates to wait for the price tag and then it has no fault.
12GB versus AMD and Nvidia at almost the same price tag
Quality of workmanship and choice of plastics at the top, great packaging - like a premium and you can still put together pidigraphy from it
Temperature in the heat about 55-60°C
Super quiet, compared to the previous RX 580 I haven't noticed yet
The price tag in unpacked condition has absolutely no competition
It runs normally even on older Ryzen, I have R7 2700x and ResizableBar enabled on MB and it's fine
Controls (perhaps only so far) a complete disaster, but at least they are clear
Drivers crash frequently, first time BSOD on my PC
Market availability is not God knows what
0 ×Report
Automatic translation
Martin, České Budějovice 1flag
Rated 12/03/2025, variant Intel Arc B580 Limited Edition
Verified purchase
When I was looking for graphics, I didn't want to limit myself in the near future, so I was looking for graphics with at least 12GB VRAM and under 7,5k, so the first choice fell on RTX 3060 (12GB). I want the card primarily for video editing, I'm not a gamer, and this is where I'm stuck with the RX 3060 as it doesn't support GPU render to the latest AV1 format. Not that I use the AV1 codec, but why limit yourself in the same price range for the possible future. RTX3060 can only decode AV1, but not encode. With it, it would go long through the CPU, but I didn't want that. Then I came across the Intel Arc B580, which can and does outperform even the RTX 4060 cards by almost 40% on cut and render, which although they already have GPU support for AV1, are slower to render, but even in overall benchmarks the Arc B580 was better in performance than the RTX 4060, which by the way for the same money only has 8GB of memory. So the price-performance ratio clearly spoke for Intel, despite the fact that it was written everywhere that the drivers are not yet 100pro, but Intel is said to be working hard on it and releasing frequent updates and there should already be more or less enough things debugged. The card also has a nice unique design and what I have to highlight is the very low noise level, the card at least my piece is inaudible, and when I loaded it in FurMark to 100% it was still very, very quiet that I had to check if the fans were spinning at all. otherwise at 100% at FullHD, the card took 150W and did not exceed 70˚C which is not too bad, if the numbers are to be believed. I think the card still has a performance margin for possible overclocking. The TDP is 190, which seems like a lot, but in practice it's around 100-140W under load, and even in the same games it's less than the more paper-efficient RTX 4060. During office work the fans are off, but they start up quite early, already when you start a video for example. Without a load, it draws more watts than the competition. The price with the gold account was a pleasant 7 268, - which corresponds to the US prices of 260USD after deducting VAT. For me, for the price, this 12GB card with performance between the RTX 4060 and 4070 has no competition. Clearly Intel isn't that prolaklenej and in future sales of the card if you want to sell it probably its price will drop more than nVidia cards. But the insider knows and the fool will then buy a more expensive nVidia or AMD. It should also be noted that a full-fledged card runs only from PCs with at least 10th Gen intel processors, i.e., for computers from 2020 and above. It is not suitable for older PCs where it is not possible to enable Resize BAR, i.e. full CPU access to video memory. After installing the card into the PC, the second monitor didn't work, it only worked after installing the Intel drivers for the card, so with the basic driver from windows only one monitor is functional, I was a bit surprised. Otherwise the intel driver installs the Take Audio driver and throws the audio to its HDMI and DisplayPort ports so the speakers stop playing, you then need to select back the soundcard on the motherboard or the one you have and where you have the speakers plugged into in the general audio settings in Win. Conclusion: I'm very happy about the card.
Nice and unique Intel design
Reference card directly from Intel
12 GB of memory
High performance, better than RTX 4060
1x 8pin
Very quiet
GPU encoder and AV1 codec decoder
Bonus game Assasin Creed Shadow
Luxury Pack with Intel Arc Wipe
Nice valuable workmanship and plating.
TDP never went over 150W
with Gold account price 7 268, -
Higher power consumption 150W at 100% utilization
Too dense radiator finning, assumption of worse cleaning.
It could easily be shorter.
Unable to turn off the LED lit logo
Not suitable for older PCs below 10Gen intel processors.
Necessity of a PC with a functional Resize BAR
Non-functional second monitor after installing the card into the PC, it only started up after installing the drivers for the card.
0 ×Report
Automatic translation
Anonymous customerflag
Rated 12/03/2025, variant Intel Arc B580 Limited Edition
Verified purchase
The graphics card is suitable for everyone thanks to the 12gb graphics memory and fairly good performance. But there are not some features like nvidia. Abroad where the card is cheaper than rtx 4060 it is very worthwhile but in the Czech Republic where the price is higher everyone has to make up their own mind.
sufficient graphics memory 12gb
relatively powerful graphics card
the price is higher in the Czech Republic and it's probably not worth it
0 ×Report
Automatic translation
Anonymous customerflag
Rated 20/02/2025, variant Intel Arc B580 Limited Edition
Verified purchase
My graphics card runs with a Ryzen 7700 and 64gb of RAM. I haven't played a game yet that runs badly on these graphics
Very quiet
Low consumption
12 GB of video memory at this price is a lot
Price-performance ratio
Ray tracing better than AMD graphics
0 ×Report
Automatic translation
Albert, Benátky nad Jizerouflag
Rated 18/02/2025, variant Intel Arc B580 Limited Edition
Verified purchase
Price
Performs fine at 1440p gaming
Driver cpu overhead
Linux drivers don't have as good performance, but since the start of sales it is much better and in the future it will all be fixed
0 ×Report
Automatic translation
Anonymous customerflag
Rated 22/01/2025, variant Intel Arc B580 Limited Edition
Verified purchase
After switching from the GTX 1060, I am completely satisfied. Games like Cyberpunk 2077, Assassin's Creed Valhalla and Red Dead Redemption 2 run at high detail with an average FPS of around 90, which is almost double the improvement over my previous card. The card can also handle demanding settings. Even under full load, the card temperatures are around 65°. If you're looking for a card for modern gaming and want to enjoy maximum image quality, the Intel Arc B580 is a great choice. Just make sure the motherboard can handle it! In other words, for the money, a blast!
Price-performance ratio
I have a folding machine on my desk.
12GB VRAM
Super processing and packaging
Transitioning from Nvidia so unusual with alw drivers it will give in
0 ×Report
Automatic translation
Anonymous customerflag
Rated 13/01/2025, variant Intel Arc B580 Limited Edition
Verified purchase
12GB VRAM
Cyberpunk 2077 can handle High detail in 4k with XeSS with basic RayTracing at 60FPS
Design, no piano black or striped plastic from 99 like on other editions
Composition in the box: )
Temperature does not exceed 61 degrees even after five hours of 100% utilization
High lowest fan speed, which leads to more audible noise than if they were running at lower speeds
0 ×Report
Automatic translation
Ondřej, Bílovice nad Svitavouflag
Rated 03/01/2025, variant Intel Arc B580 Limited Edition
Verified purchase
I don't use Windows, so I can't describe the performance or experience on Windows. all related to experience on the openSUSE Tumbleweed Linux distribution. I bought the card primarily for video processing and also for running Ollama home server (local GPT models). If you're thinking of buying right now and it has to be an Intel GPU, I'd recommend the previous generation Arc A770 16GB, which is almost the same price, has more VRAM and more debugged drivers. Current and higher performance for general purposes. I bought the card out of curiosity, and I'll probably sell it the moment Intel releases the B770 (or whatever the higher end with more VRAM is called).
Good support on Linux out-of-the-box from kernel version 6.12 and Mesa 24.3
Performance on Linux is generally comparable or a bit lower than Intel Arc A770 16GB (the 4GB is missing) despite the fact that it is new hardware (so certainly a lot of optimizations are not yet implemented). Unfortunately, I haven't tested the "gaming" performance outside of benchmarks. For a last-gen GPU, the price is very reasonable.
Lower power consumption than A770 in idle on Linux, but not lower than AMD Radeon RX 7800XT.
Like the previous generation, this is my number one choice for video encoding. In a lot of objective metrics, it's even capable of outperforming "ordinary" GeForce cards from Nvidia. And throughput is often better than Nvidia cards. Intergenerationally, this card can encode AV1 a bit better, but the VPL library is still struggling with a few bugs, which will be even more noticeable once resolved.
Compared to AMD's GPU, it is better at video encoding in all categories (throughput, encoding quality, latency (in low-latency configuration), bitrate control (far more suitable for archiving), format support), but so was the previous generation of Intel cards. If you don't mind a worse ecosystem of video editing/recording programs than Nvidia cards, I'd recommend trying Intel.
Native support for more professional formats like HEVC 12-bit 4:4:4:4 and even more obscure interlaced video encoded with HEVC/H.264, which hasn't been supported in NVENC on Nvidia cards for years (almost a decade). Still encoding 12-bit content is unsupported (decoding only).
Of course, the card supports B-frame encoding as well as lookup for better bitrate control decisions - the resulting encode is comparable (even in terms of subjective quality) to software encoders in medium (x264/H.264) and fast (x265/HEVC) settings. So on the format side there are not many changes compared to the previous generation.
It's only dual-slot, like the original A770 16GB edition. This is especially useful if one wants to run multiple GPUs in one "ordinary" computer.
only the 12GB version.
So far less AI performance than I expected despite OneAPI. This may be due to the fact that the drivers are not yet optimized. but it's almost identical to the A770 16GB
Generationally it's not that much of a leap, perhaps the only thing visibly improved over the A770 is a better performance/consumption ratio.
As with the previous generation, it is necessary to have ReBAR enabled in the BIOS, without it the GPU performance is noticeably worse. It is therefore advisable to make sure that CSM ("legacy bootloader support") is not enabled in the BIOS and that the board supports ReBAR at all.
On Linux, the driver prints a message on startup that ReBAR is not available.
For AMD and Nvidia, the impact of having ReBAR turned off is far less, but it's still there.
Support for VP9 encoding has been removed compared to the last generation, but VP8/9 decoding remains (in the full specification - i.e. Profiles 0-3, which is not supported by AMD or Nvidia). Intel's strong VP9 encoder artifacts on previous generations and poor compression efficiency alongside other options just didn't make sense. On paper, the GPU lost support for encoding to a single codec, but in reality it just freed up unnecessary silicon.
B580 did not get support for H.266/VVC (successor to HEVC), even though Lunar Lake processors already have support for VVC decoding.
0 ×Report
Automatic translation
Companyflag
Rated 02/01/2025, variant Intel Arc B580 Limited Edition
Verified purchase
Yes, it can play Crysis
Good, affordable card for 1440p
0 ×Report
21 - 30 from 33
P-DC1-WEB10

Blitzschnelle Lieferung in Wien und Umgebung Nutze unsere AlzaBox-Abholstellen und die 24/7-Filiale Karsplatz. More info »